Board Members

Experienced builders can join the HighBar board as paid or volunteer reviewers, challenge applicants during monthly check-ins, and make the pass/fail calls that give each HighBar credential its credibility. The work is evidence-first, policy-bound, and designed to protect applicants, reviewers, employers, and HighBar's reputation.

Board member dashboard showing applicants and upcoming Demo Days

What board members do

You are not there to rubber-stamp a pitch. You help applicants face the kind of expert scrutiny that makes a HighBar credential worth trusting, while using the same boundaries described on Demo Day.

Monthly check-insAsk sharper questions

Spend 15 minutes with an applicant, review public evidence, score the work, and pass or fail the check-in with a clear next step.

Demo DayProtect the credential

Watch the live defense, test claims, and decide whether the work clears the 75% pass/fail cutoff.

Good causeChange a trajectory

Your judgment can turn scattered effort into a credential, a job conversation, or a more serious internship.

Use the same evidence standard

Board members should expect applicants to show real work, honest failures, and one public YouTube video. The goal is to review the evidence, not charisma.

Public YouTube evidence

The official evidence, presentation, and artifact format is one public YouTube video, 30-60 seconds long, posted within 24 hours before the check-in or Demo Day.

Voice, webcam, screen, work

The applicant's voice should walk through that one video, with webcam on for 100% of it, plus screen sharing and live footage of the project.

Counterfeit evidence watch

Watch for polished claims with no working demo, hidden helper work, copied code without attribution, or AI-generated explanations the applicant cannot defend.

Useful pressure

Challenge evidence, assumptions, and trade-offs. Do not grade accent, background, confidence, or presentation polish as a substitute for skill.

Score the same six signals

Every check-in is scored from 0-100% across the same core metrics. Demo Day is a bigger check-in with more pressure and a broader audience. 75% is the pass/fail cutoff.

Working artifact Evidence quality Failure analysis Stakeholder signal Safety and ethics Readiness next step
Advisor helping an apprentice build marketable skills

A taste of the work

Board service is intentionally lightweight, direct, and evidence-first.

1

Choose a domain. Tell us where you can evaluate real work: robotics, AI, healthcare, design, operations, or another practical specialty.

2

Take a check-in. Meet by phone or Zoom. Cameras on or off is fine for the meeting, but the official artifact still needs one public YouTube video with voice, screen share, webcam, and live footage.

3

Join Demo Day. When a candidate is ready, serve on a panel and make a clear pass/fail decision with other experts.

Payment and volunteer options

Some experts volunteer. Some are hired. Both paths help applicants get serious feedback from people who know what real work looks like. Compensation details come after fit, availability, and scope are clear.

Monthly check-ins

Flat fee per 15-minute check-in visit. Phone call or Zoom is fine, and cameras can be on or off. Every extra check-in still costs the applicant $100 or one qualified check-in credit.

Demo Day panels

Flat fee per Demo Day appearance, negotiated when you are hired for a panel or specialty track. Demo Day should happen only after a passing fourth check-in.

Boundaries protect everyone

Applicants control their cadence, but any monthly check-in or Demo Day can only be delayed up to 30 days without consequence; after that, the consequence is minus one check-in credit. After 3 failed check-ins, the applicant waits 6 months before the next check-in. After 6 failed check-ins, the wall is 1 year. These boundaries protect applicants from spending before evidence is ready, protect reviewers from repeated low-signal meetings, and protect employers from trusting a credential too early.

Example board view

ApplicantHighBar areaBoard signalNext decision
Ava ChenComputer Vision82% passInvite to Demo Day
Jonas ErikssonEnergy Systems68% revise15m retake check-in
Priya NairBiomedical NLP61% failRevise public video evidence
Lucas MoreauRoboticsCredit availableMentor-sponsored check-in

Bring your standards to the board

Volunteer, accept paid check-ins, sponsor applicant credits, or help us build a stronger expert panel in your field. You can be generous without weakening the standard.